Issue 8022: Derived union notation (uml2-rtf) Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Derived union notation Why is the semantics and notation for subsetting/redefinition in Association, while derived union is in Property? Resolution: Discussion This issue has already been resolved by, or no longer applies to, the UML 2.5 Beta 1 specification. Disposition: Closed - No Change Revised Text: Actions taken: December 30, 2004: received issue February 20, 2015: closed issue Discussion: Disposition: Deferred to UML 2.4 RTF End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 30 Dec 2004 15:16:07 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Conrad Bock Company: NIST mailFrom: conrad.bock@nist.gov Notification: No Specification: UML 2 Super Section: Classes FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: 2.0 RevisionDate: 04-10-02 Page: - Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Description Derived union notation Why is the semantics and notation for subsetting/redefinition in Association, while derived union is in Property?