Issue 8068: typing error in the statement :unrestricted ? (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: believe there is a typing error in the statement :unrestricted: Indicated that there is no restriction no [should be to?] adding new values, changing a value, or removing values to an occurrence of a StructuralFeature Resolution: Revised Text: In section 9.2.1 in the text accompanying the “unrestricted?” entry on page 44 of ptc/04-11- 16, replace the phrase: Indicates that there is no restriction no adding new values, with the phrase: Indicates that there is no restriction on adding new values, Editor’s note: Not done, superseded by the resolution to issue 6216. Actions taken: January 4, 2005: received issue August 23, 2006: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 04 Jan 2005 11:52:13 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov Notification: Yes Specification: Infrastructure Section: 9.2.1 FormalNumber: ptc/03-09-15 Version: 2.0 RevisionDate: 12/01/2003 Page: 43 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description I believe there is a typing error in the statement :unrestricted: Indicated that there is no restriction no [should be to?] adding new values, changing a value, or removing values to an occurrence of a StructuralFeature.