Issue 8114: Section: 9.3.7 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Correct multiplicity of role:ConnectableElement[1] so that fig. 96 agrees with that defined in Associations. Add OCL notation for Constraints. Ports under Notation also reads to me like it could be expressed in OCL notation somewhere--like a constraint which would need to be added. Resolution: Discussion This issue has already been resolved by, or no longer applies to, the UML 2.5 Beta 1 specification. Disposition: Closed - No Change Revised Text: Actions taken: January 24, 2005: received issue February 20, 2015: closed issue Discussion: Disposition: Deferred to UML 2.4 RTF End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 24 Jan 2005 16:27:19 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov Notification: Yes Specification: Superstructure Section: 9.3.7 FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted RevisionDate: 10/08/2004 Page: 186 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description Correct multiplicity of role:ConnectableElement[1] so that fig. 96 agrees with that defined in Associations. Add OCL notation for Constraints. Ports under Notation also reads to me like it could be expressed in OCL notation somewhere--like a constraint which would need to be added.