Issue 8116: Section: 9.3.9 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Add OCL notation to Constraints. Notation says to see "CallOperationAction" for an example, but no examples are given in that section Resolution: Revised Text: In notation, delete the parenthetical remark starting with “(for example…”. Actions taken: January 24, 2005: received issue August 23, 2006: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 24 Jan 2005 17:00:37 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov Notification: Yes Specification: Superstructure Section: 9.3.9 FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted RevisionDate: 10/08/2004 Page: 188 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description Add OCL notation to Constraints. Notation says to see "CallOperationAction" for an example, but no examples are given in that section. Issue 8116: Section: 9.3.9 Issue summary Add OCL notation to Constraints. Notation says to see 'CallOperationAction' for an example, but no examples are given in that section Discussion I don't know how to find out the receiver object of the invocation action. It could be for example a Broad Cast Signal Action? that has no defined receiver objects. -- TimWeilkiens 30 May 2005 Revised Test In notation, delete the parenthetical remark starting with .(for example... Issue 8116: Section: 9.3.9 Issue summary Add OCL notation to Constraints. Notation says to see 'CallOperationAction' for an example, but no examples are given in that section Discussion I don't know how to find out the receiver object of the invocation action. It could be for example a Broad Cast Signal Action? that has no defined receiver objects since it is a semantic variation point. -- TimWeilkiens 30 May 2005 I'll propose to not provide an OCL constraint. I'm not sure if we should handle the Broad Cast Signal Action? problem described above. Do we need to update the constraint? -- TimWeilkiens 21 July 2005 Revised Test In notation, delete the parenthetical remark starting with .(for example... Resolution Resolved RtfIssue1000000048 (27 Jul 2005 - 20:19 - r1.2 - BranSelic) Issue 8116: Section: 9.3.9 Issue summary Add OCL notation to Constraints. Notation says to see 'CallOperationAction' for an example, but no examples are given in that section Discussion I don't know how to find out the receiver object of the invocation action. It could be for example a Broad Cast Signal Action? that has no defined receiver objects since it is a semantic variation point. -- TimWeilkiens 30 May 2005 I'll propose to not provide an OCL constraint. I'm not sure if we should handle the Broad Cast Signal Action? problem described above. Do we need to update the constraint? -- TimWeilkiens 21 July 2005 Revised Test In notation, delete the parenthetical remark starting with .(for example... Resolution Resolved RtfIssue1000000048 (27 Jul 2005 - 20:19 - r1.2 - BranSelic)