Issue 8176: Section: 11.3.31 (uml2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: Fig 153 shows that the association result:OutputPin[1..1] is subsetted. Add OCL notation for constraint [1]. I believe the wording of constraint [1] might be better as: "The type of the result output pin is the type of the classifier."

Resolution: see above
Revised Text: In Actions, ReadExtentAction, Associations, result entry, at end of description add
“(subsets Action:output)”.
Actions taken:
January 28, 2005: received issue
August 23, 2006: closed issue
Discussion: 
OCL is duplicate with 6346. The wording is correct as is. The type is exactly the
classifier, rather than the type of the classifier (which would be a powertype, or a
metametaclass).
End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org 
Date: 28 Jan 2005 17:09:21 -0500 
To: <issues@omg.org> 
Subject: Issue/Bug Report 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Jane Messenger
Company: U. S. Geological Survey
mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov
Notification: Yes
Specification: Superstructure
Section: 11.3.31
FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02
Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted
RevisionDate: 10/08/2004
Page: 285
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461)
Description
Fig 153 shows that the association result:OutputPin[1..1] is subsetted. Add OCL notation for constraint [1]. I believe the wording of constraint [1] might be better as: "The type of the result output pin is the type of the classifier."