Issue 8222: Section: 12.3.10 (uml2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: Associated fig. 184 does not show generalizations from FundamentalActivities for ActivityGroup or from Dependencies for NamedElement. The association activity:Activity[0..1] is not diagrammed in fig. 184. The description for the association represents:Element[0..1] needs rewording. Does it mean "An element constraining the behaviors invoked by the nodes in the partition" (constraining used as a verb) or "The element constraining behaviors that are invoked by the nodes in the partition (constraining used as the noun "constraining behaviors")? Fig. 184 shows additional associations: ContainedEdge:ActivityEdge[1..1] and containedNode:ActivityNode[1..1]. These need to be added to text. Add OCL notation to constraints.

Resolution: see above
Revised Text: In Activities, ActivityPartition, Associations, add entries:
containedNode : ActivityNode [0..*] Nodes immediately contained in the
partition. Redefined from ActivityGroup::containedNode. containedEdge : ActivityEdge [0..*] Edges immediately contained in the partition.
Redefines ActivityGroup::containedEdge.
Actions taken:
February 3, 2005: received issue
August 23, 2006: closed issue
Discussion: 
In Figure 184:
The generalization to ActivityGroup (BasicActivities) is correct because the
figure is in IntermediateActivities, which depends on BasicActivities.
The generalization to NamedElement (Kernel) is correct because
IntermediateActivities depends on Kernel, through BasicActivities and
FundamentalActivities.
The association activity:Activity[0..1] is not diagrammed because it is inherited
without specialization.
In ActivityPartition:
The description for the association represents:Element[0..1] uses “constraining”
as a verb. Neither sentence suggested by the filer seems better, and using
"constraining behaviors" in the particular sentence cited would be ungrammatical.
Rest is duplicate of 6346.

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org 
Date: 03 Feb 2005 15:37:20 -0500 
To: <issues@omg.org> 
Subject: Issue/Bug Report 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Jane Messenger
Company: U. S. Geological Survey
mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov
Notification: Yes
Specification: Superstructure
Section: 12.3.10
FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02
Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted
RevisionDate: 10/08/2004
Page: 367-368
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461)
Description
Associated fig. 184 does not show generalizations from FundamentalActivities for ActivityGroup or from Dependencies for NamedElement. The association activity:Activity[0..1] is not diagrammed in fig. 184. The description for the association represents:Element[0..1] needs rewording. Does it mean "An element constraining the behaviors invoked by the nodes in the partition" (constraining used as a verb) or "The element constraining behaviors that are invoked by the nodes in the partition (constraining used as the noun "constraining behaviors")? Fig. 184 shows additional associations: ContainedEdge:ActivityEdge[1..1] and containedNode:ActivityNode[1..1]. These need to be added to text. Add OCL notation to constraints.