Issue 8237: Section: 12.3.6 & 12.3.19 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: I'm confused. Fig. 178 shows ActivityFinalNode as a child of ControlNode in the BasicActivities sub-package, but in fig. 183 it is a "grandchild" of ControlNode and a child of FinalNod in the IntermediateActivities sub-package. Can a concept be both a child and a grandchild of the same higher-level concept, in this case ControlNode? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: February 4, 2005: received issue August 23, 2006: closed issue Discussion: Yes, a class can have the same grandparent through more than one generalization path. In this case, it is done because an intermediate class is not in one of the packages, while its parent and child are. Disposition: Closed, no change End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 04 Feb 2005 15:41:39 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov Notification: Yes Specification: Superstructure Section: 12.3.6 & 12.3.19 FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted RevisionDate: 10/08/2004 Page: 356 & 382-384 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description I'm confused. Fig. 178 shows ActivityFinalNode as a child of ControlNode in the BasicActivities sub-package, but in fig. 183 it is a "grandchild" of ControlNode and a child of FinalNod in the IntermediateActivities sub-package. Can a concept be both a child and a grandchild of the same higher-level concept, in this case ControlNode? Reply-To: From: "Conrad Bock" To: "Branislav Selic" , Subject: RE: Ballot 2 draft Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:06:32 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Hi Bran, Comments on draft ballot 2, on my own, sorry! Conrad - Issue 8237 The Revised Text should be empty, and the Resolution should be "Closed no change". - Issue 8481 In Revised Text, last paragraph, after "structured node", remove comma. - Issue 8496