Issue 8266: Section: 5.1.1 (hutn-ftf) Source: Queensland University of Technology (Dr. Kerry Raymond, k.raymond(at)qut.edu.au) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: The description of "container" uniqueness is not quite correct. Currently it says "This value indicates that the scope or uniqueness of attribute values identifying class instances is the set of instances of this class participating in a containment relationship with the same container instance as this class does." This is not correct. What it is trying to say is (informally) this. A container object contains contained objects. Some of these contained objects will be instances of classes which have this "container" uniqueness scope, and the identifiers for these contained objects must be unique. That is, the uniqueness isn't just over objects of *this* class in the same container, but over objects of *any* class (which has container-uniquness) in the same container. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: February 10, 2005: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 10 Feb 2005 20:54:55 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Kerry Raymond Company: DSTC mailFrom: kerry@dstc.edu.au Notification: Yes Specification: Human Usable Textual Notation Section: 5.1.1 FormalNumber: formal/04-08-01 Version: 1.0 RevisionDate: Aug 2004 Page: 5.2 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Description The description of "container" uniqueness is not quite correct. Currently it says "This value indicates that the scope or uniqueness of attribute values identifying class instances is the set of instances of this class participating in a containment relationship with the same container instance as this class does." This is not correct. What it is trying to say is (informally) this. A container object contains contained objects. Some of these contained objects will be instances of classes which have this "container" uniqueness scope, and the identifiers for these contained objects must be unique. That is, the uniqueness isn't just over objects of *this* class in the same container, but over objects of *any* class (which has container-uniquness) in the same container.