Issue 8320: Section: 13.3.30 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: The generalization "Dependencies" is not listed in fig. 316 under NamedElement. Add this to the figure. The association port:Port[*] is not diagrammed anywhere. Either remove this association from the text or add it to a figure. The sub-section Changes from UML 1.x indicates that the corresponding metaclass was changed from Event but names listed in the BNF definition are all children or grandchildren of the metaclass Event in fig. 317. I believe something needs to change or be clarified but I don't know what. Resolution: see above Revised Text: In 13.3.30, subsection “Generalizations”, delete “Dependencies” from the list of generalizations for NamedElement. Editor’s note: This is not possible, since the wording here is automatically generated from the cross-reference. The cross-reference is merely a pointer and not a formal definition. Delete specification of association end "port" from sub-section “Associations”. Actions taken: February 22, 2005: received issue August 23, 2006: closed issue Discussion: The port association was moved into the composite structure package. Regarding the question as to the BNF, this is intended. The trigger references the specified event. End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 22 Feb 2005 17:17:19 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov Notification: Yes Specification: Superstructure Section: 13.3.30 FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted RevisionDate: 10/08/2004 Page: 494-496 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description The generalization "Dependencies" is not listed in fig. 316 under NamedElement. Add this to the figure. The association port:Port[*] is not diagrammed anywhere. Either remove this association from the text or add it to a figure. The sub-section Changes from UML 1.x indicates that the corresponding metaclass was changed from Event but names listed in the BNF definition are all children or grandchildren of the metaclass Event in fig. 317. I believe something needs to change or be clarified but I don't know what. Issue 8320: Section: 13.3.30 Issue summary The generalization 'Dependencies' is not listed in fig. 316 under Named Element?. Add this to the figure. The association port:Port[*] is not diagrammed anywhere. Either remove this association from the text or add it to a figure. The sub-section Changes from UML 1.x indicates that the corresponding metaclass was changed from Event but names listed in the BNF definition are all children or grandchildren of the metaclass Event in fig. 317. I believe something needs to change or be clarified but I don't know what. Discussion The port association was moved into the composite structure package. Regarding the question as to the BNF, this is intended. The trigger references the specified event. Revised Test In 13.3.30, subsection .Generalizations., delete .Dependencies. from the list of generalizations for Named Element?. Delete specification of association end "port" from sub-section .Associations.. Resolution