Issue 8326: Section: 14.3.5 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Fig. 331 does not show package name for the generalization InteractionFragment. Typo - Change paragraph 3 of Notation to "A Continuation that is alone in an InteractionFragment is considered to be at the end of the enclosing InteractionFragment." Resolution: see above Revised Text: Before (Section: 14.3.5, page 516) Continuations that are alone in an InteractionFragment is considered to be at the end of the enclosing InteractionFragment. Revised Text: A Continuation that is alone in an InteractionFragment is considered to be at the end of the enclosing InteractionFragment. Actions taken: February 23, 2005: received issue August 23, 2006: closed issue Discussion: For point a) above, there is nothing special with InteractionFragment. It is defined in Interactions. No change should be done. For point b) the suggested correction is correct. End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 23 Feb 2005 15:42:14 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov Notification: Yes Specification: Superstructure Section: 14.3.5 FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted RevisionDate: 10/08/2004 Page: 516 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description Fig. 331 does not show package name for the generalization InteractionFragment. Typo - Change paragraph 3 of Notation to "A Continuation that is alone in an InteractionFragment is considered to be at the end of the enclosing InteractionFragment."