Issue 8342: Section: 14.3.18 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Second sentence in sub-section Description is missing a word. "...the contents of the referred Interaction xxx [from?? to??] where the InteractionUse is." Change the class name of the association argument:InputPin[*] either on fig 333 to InputPin or to Action in the text. Class name in fig. 333 is Action. This association is also shown in the figure as ordered. Association actualGate:Gate[*] subsets ownedElement. Mention specialization in definition of the association. I'm confused between the BNF use of io-argument and your use of argument. If the name of the association is "io-argument" as indicated by BNF and Issue 1751, should the name on the diagram and in the sub-section Associations be changed to io-argument? Also, para 2 on og 534 italizes argument instead of io-argument. Typo - Second sent. on pg. 534 needs a space between "explained" and "in." Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: February 24, 2005: received issue February 20, 2015: closed issue Discussion: Discussion This issue has already been resolved by, or no longer applies to, the UML 2.5 Beta 1 specification. Disposition: Closed - No Change End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 24 Feb 2005 12:34:18 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov Notification: Yes Specification: Superstructure Section: 14.3.18 FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted RevisionDate: 10/08/2004 Page: 532-534 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description Second sentence in sub-section Description is missing a word. "...the contents of the referred Interaction xxx [from?? to??] where the InteractionUse is." Change the class name of the association argument:InputPin[*] either on fig 333 to InputPin or to Action in the text. Class name in fig. 333 is Action. This association is also shown in the figure as ordered. Association actualGate:Gate[*] subsets ownedElement. Mention specialization in definition of the association. I'm confused between the BNF use of io-argument and your use of argument. If the name of the association is "io-argument" as indicated by BNF and Issue 1751, should the name on the diagram and in the sub-section Associations be changed to io-argument? Also, para 2 on og 534 italizes argument instead of io-argument. Typo - Second sent. on pg. 534 needs a space between "explained" and "in."