Issue 8467: Section: 16.3.5 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: Add the generalization "NamedElement (from Kernal)" on page xxx (page 100 I believe). This generalization is shown in fig. 401 and mentioned in the Description sub-section. Delete sub-sections Attributes and Constraints or change wording to "None." In sub-section Semantics, I'm not certain that the following statement is reflected in fig. 401 "Since the primary use of the include relationship is for reuse of common parts, what is left in a base use case is usually not complete in iteself by dependent on the included parts to be meaningful. This is relfected in the direction of the relationship, indicating that the base use case depends on the addition but not vice versa." Reword 2nd sent of para 2, Semantics, to "All of the behavior of the included use case is executed...." or "The included use case behavior is executed at a single..." Resolution: see above Revised Text: In generalizations section of 16.3.5: Add “NamedElement (from Kernel) on page <ref>” Editor’s note: The above was already done by 8465 In semantics section of 16.3.5: Reword 2 nd sentence of 2 nd paragraph to “All of the behavior of the included use case is executed at a single location in the included use case before execution of the including use case is resumed.” (Note: Replaced 10 th word from “are” to “is”) Editor’s note: fixed in formal copy edit Actions taken: March 4, 2005: received issue August 23, 2006: closed issue Discussion: Sub-section Attributes and Constraints are not empty. It seems that the submitter refers to ptc/03-08-02. Fig. 401 reflects the content of the quoted sentence as far as it is possible for a class diagram. End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 04 Mar 2005 12:19:14 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov Notification: Yes Specification: Superstructure Section: 16.3.5 FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: 2.0 Draft Adopted RevisionDate: 10/08/2004 Page: 649-650 Nature: Revision Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description Add the generalization "NamedElement (from Kernal)" on page xxx (page 100 I believe). This generalization is shown in fig. 401 and mentioned in the Description sub-section. Delete sub-sections Attributes and Constraints or change wording to "None." In sub-section Semantics, I'm not certain that the following statement is reflected in fig. 401 "Since the primary use of the include relationship is for reuse of common parts, what is left in a base use case is usually not complete in iteself by dependent on the included parts to be meaningful. This is relfected in the direction of the relationship, indicating that the base use case depends on the addition but not vice versa." Reword 2nd sent of para 2, Semantics, to "All of the behavior of the included use case is executed...." or "The included use case behavior is executed at a single..."