Issue 8481: Section: Activities (uml2-rtf) Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: <pre> ExceptionHandler, clarify working of constraint [1]: "[1] The exception body may not have any explicit input or output edges." It should say the exception handler and its input object node are not the source or target of any edge. </pre> Resolution: Revised Text: In Activities, ExceptionHandler, Constraints: Constraint 1, replace text with "The exception handler and its input object node are not the source or target of any edge." Add a new constraint after constraint 1: "An edge that has a source in an exception handler structured node must have its target in the handler also, and vice versa." Editor’s note: Made slight rewording change for readability Actions taken: March 6, 2005: received issue August 23, 2006: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 06 Mar 2005 10:18:06 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Conrad Bock Company: NIST mailFrom: conrad.bock@nist.gov Notification: No Specification: UML 2 Superstructure Section: Activities FormalNumber: ptc/04-10-02 Version: RevisionDate: Page: Nature: Revision Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Description
 ExceptionHandler, clarify working of constraint [1]: "[1] The exception body may not have any explicit input or output edges." It should say the exception handler and its input object node are not the source or target of any edge. 
Reply-To: From: "Conrad Bock" To: "Branislav Selic" , Subject: RE: Ballot 2 draft Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:06:32 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Hi Bran, Comments on draft ballot 2, on my own, sorry! Conrad - Issue 8237 The Revised Text should be empty, and the Resolution should be "Closed no change". - Issue 8481 In Revised Text, last paragraph, after "structured node", remove comma. - Issue 8496