Issue 8620: Section: 7.4 (ocl2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: I'm not certain if I should report this issue to the OCL group or to the UML Superstructure group, but... the Basic Types listed in OCL do not agree with the Primitive Types listed in the UML Superstucture. OCL lists "Real" as a primitive (basic type), UML Superstructure does not, instead listing UnlimitedNatural as a primitive type. Shouldn't the two agree?

Resolution: UML 2.5 introduces Real. UnlimiteralNatural has been in UML for a long time.
Disposition: Closed, no change
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 23, 2005: received issue
December 23, 2013: closed issue
Discussion: 


End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org 
Date: 23 Mar 2005 15:46:09 -0500 
To: <issues@omg.org> 
Subject: Issue/Bug Report 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Jane Messenger
Company: U. S. Geological Survey
mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov
Notification: Yes
Specification: UML 2.0 OCL Specification
Section: 7.4
FormalNumber: ptc/03-10-14
Version: Adopted Specification
RevisionDate: 10/14/2003
Page: 10
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461)
Description
I'm not certain if I should report this issue to the OCL group or to the UML Superstructure group, but... the Basic Types listed in OCL do not agree with the Primitive Types listed in the UML Superstucture. OCL lists "Real" as a primitive (basic type), UML Superstructure does not, instead listing UnlimitedNatural as a primitive type. Shouldn't the two agree?