Issue 8628: Section: 8.2 (ocl2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Typos - 1st line, 3rd para under The Types Package, delete "and" between "CollectionType" and "its." - 2nd sent., 3rd para under The Types Package, change "taken in account" to "taken into account." - 2nd sent., under OclMessageType, change "Like to the collection" to "Like collection." - Last sent. under TupleType, delete the word "to." In sub-section CollectionType, there is no mention of the fourth concrete subclass which is shown in fig. 5 as OrderedSetType. Add this to the list of concrete subclasses or change fig. 5 to indicate that OrderedSetType is not a subclass of CollectionType (possibly a subclass of SetType?). Sub-section 7.5.11 also indicates only three different collection types. In addition, CollectionTypes [1] on pg 36 ("--all instances of SetType, SequenceType, BagType conform to a CollectionType if the elementTypes conform") makes no mention of OrderedSetType. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: March 24, 2005: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 24 Mar 2005 13:31:27 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Jane Messenger Company: U. S. Geological Survey mailFrom: j Notification: Yes Specification: UML 2.0 OCL Specification Section: 8.2 FormalNumber: ptc/03-10-14 Version: Adopted Specification RevisionDate: 10/14/2003 Page: 33-35 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461) Description Typos - 1st line, 3rd para under The Types Package, delete "and" between "CollectionType" and "its." - 2nd sent., 3rd para under The Types Package, change "taken in account" to "taken into account." - 2nd sent., under OclMessageType, change "Like to the collection" to "Like collection." - Last sent. under TupleType, delete the word "to." In sub-section CollectionType, there is no mention of the fourth concrete subclass which is shown in fig. 5 as OrderedSetType. Add this to the list of concrete subclasses or change fig. 5 to indicate that OrderedSetType is not a subclass of CollectionType (possibly a subclass of SetType?). Sub-section 7.5.11 also indicates only three different collection types. In addition, CollectionTypes [1] on pg 36 ("--all instances of SetType, SequenceType, BagType conform to a CollectionType if the elementTypes conform") makes no mention of OrderedSetType.