Issue 8642: Section: 10.2 (ocl2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: The last paragraph on pg 94 that describes fig. 15 does not agree in names with the value names shown in fig. 15. StaticValue equates to the daya values the paragraph mentions and OclVoidValue apparently equates to "UndefinedValue." Since "UndefinedValue" and "OclVoidValue" both have the format of a class name this could lead to confusion. OclVoidValue, as later defined, is an undefined value so please change "UndefinedValue" in the open paragraph of this section.


Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 28, 2005: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org 
Date: 28 Mar 2005 15:26:07 -0500 
To: <issues@omg.org> 
Subject: Issue/Bug Report 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Jane Messenger
Company: U. S. Geological Survey
mailFrom: jmessenger@usgs.gov
Notification: Yes
Specification: UML 2.0 OCL Specification
Section: 10.2
FormalNumber: ptc/03-10-14
Version: Adopted Specification
RevisionDate: 10/14/2003
Page: 94-95
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461)
Description
The last paragraph on pg 94 that describes fig. 15 does not agree in names with the value names shown in fig. 15. StaticValue equates to the daya values the paragraph mentions and OclVoidValue apparently equates to "UndefinedValue." Since "UndefinedValue" and "OclVoidValue" both have the format of a class name this could lead to confusion. OclVoidValue, as later defined, is an undefined value so please change "UndefinedValue" in the open paragraph of this section.