Issue 8713: Section 3.1.1                                                                                                                                                                                           (snp-ftf)
Source: Japan Biological Informatics Consortium (Mr. Martin Senger, martin.senger@gmail.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 6. Section 3.1.1 - In looking at the model and the XML Schema, it is not
clear how the model maps to the schema.  For example in looking at
Assayed_genomic_genotype, the association cardinalities
(multiplicities if you will) map differently. for example the '* *'
between Polymorphism_Assay and Molecular_Sample, maps to minoccurs =
1, maxoccurs = 1, but between Polymorphism_Assay and
Consensus_genomic_genotype maps to minoccurs =0, max occurs = 1.  So
it is not clear if the semantics in the diagram and the XSD are
consistent.


Discussion: will be solved by new conversion software tool


Proposed solution:


not yet
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 26, 2005: received issue
November 1, 2005: closed issue
Discussion: 
Discussion

Will be solved by a new conversion software tool.

Resolution:
The change solving this issue is described elsewhere, in other issue or issues. General solution is that a new conversion tool XSDMaker (see issue 8709) solves these inconsistencies.


Disposition:	Resolved

End of Annotations:=====
ection 3.1.1 - In looking at the model and the XML Schema, it is not
clear how the model maps to the schema.  For example in looking at
Assayed_genomic_genotype, the association cardinalities
(multiplicities if you will) map differently. for example the '* *'
between Polymorphism_Assay and Molecular_Sample, maps to minoccurs =
1, maxoccurs = 1, but between Polymorphism_Assay and
Consensus_genomic_genotype maps to minoccurs =0, max occurs = 1.  So
it is not clear if the semantics in the diagram and the XSD are
consistent.


Discussion: will be solved by new conversion software tool


Proposed solution:


not yet