Issue 8786: Arguments of Message (uml2-rtf)
Source: No Magic, Inc. (Mr. Nerijus Jankevicius, nerijus(at)nomagic.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 3. Arguments of Message 
Variables, members and other "value holders" can be used as arguments of call actions or arguments of message (for example setName(name) where "name" is variable defined in Interaction), but now arguments are simple ValueSpecification, so can't have reference to "real" argument (variable, member, parameter of behavior etc.)
Maybe Argument should be in metamodel as in UML 1.4, or at least ValueSpecification should be subclassed in Interactions package and introduce reference to Element that value it represents?
Resolution: See issue 8761 for disposition
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
May 18, 2005: received issue
Discussion: 
Due to lack of time, the RTF/FTF agrees that the following are problems that need fixing, but decided to defer their resolution to a future RTF working on this specification.
End of Annotations:=====
rguments of Message 
Variables, members and other "value holders" can be used as arguments of call actions or arguments of message (for example setName(name) where "name" is variable defined in Interaction), but now arguments are simple ValueSpecification, so can't have reference to "real" argument (variable, member, parameter of behavior etc.)
Maybe Argument should be in metamodel as in UML 1.4, or at least ValueSpecification should be subclassed in Interactions package and introduce reference to Element that value it represents?