Issue 8974: Missing notation for association classes (uml2-rtf) Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The notation for Associations allows them to be depicted as a diamond (even binary associations). However the Notation for AssociationClasses assumes the Association is depicted as a line only, and does not describe an option for attaching an AssociationClass to an Association shown as a diamond. This should be fairly obvious - just have the dotted line attached to the diamond instead of the Association's line. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: August 23, 2005: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== ubject: Issue on UML2 Superstructure: Missing notation for association classes Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 05:44:46 -0400 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Issue on UML2 Superstructure: Missing notation for association classes Thread-Index: AcWnxGIO3fMnAgBuS6G5U/JsVhEYDg== From: "Pete Rivett" To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at sentraliant.com The notation for Associations allows them to be depicted as a diamond (even binary associations). However the Notation for AssociationClasses assumes the Association is depicted as a line only, and does not describe an option for attaching an AssociationClass to an Association shown as a diamond. This should be fairly obvious - just have the dotted line attached to the diamond instead of the Association's line. Pete Rivett (mailto:pete.rivett@adaptive.com) CTO, Adaptive Inc. Dean Park House, 8-10 Dean Park Crescent, Bournemouth, BH1 1HL, UK Tel: +44 (0)1202 449419 Fax: +44 (0)1202 449448 http://www.adaptive.com