Issue 9111: Page: 492-493 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Hello, it is not clear to me whether it is still possible in UML2.0 to specify in interaction diagram (either sequence or communication) broadcast actions and lifeline representing multi-object. Figures Fig.14.22 and 14.23 (Superstructure 05-07-04), actually show the possibility of representing instances of the same type (class B) each one represented by a different lifeline: the selectors in that case are used to identify one specific instance and not a set of instances. Regards, Simona Bernardi Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: October 24, 2005: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 24 Oct 2005 08:42:02 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Simona Company: University of Turin, Italy mailFrom: bernardi@di.unito.it Notification: Yes Specification: Superstructure UML2.0 Section: Interactions FormalNumber: Superstructure Specification Version: 2.0 RevisionDate: 05-07-04 Page: 492-493 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Description Hello, it is not clear to me whether it is still possible in UML2.0 to specify in interaction diagram (either sequence or communication) broadcast actions and lifeline representing multi-object. Figures Fig.14.22 and 14.23 (Superstructure 05-07-04), actually show the possibility of representing instances of the same type (class B) each one represented by a different lifeline: the selectors in that case are used to identify one specific instance and not a set of instances. Regards, Simona Bernardi