Issue 9156: Numbering and references to examples are not consistent                                                                                                                                                 (mof2idl-ftf)
Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS (Mr. Michael Soden, soden@ikv.de soden@fokus.fraunhofer.de)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Example 8 is missing and example 10 references example 10 rather than example 4.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: Example 9 should become example 8 and all following examples should be adjusted too. The statement
"If the class C and the package MyPackage of Example (10) shall support Reflection, …"
Should be altered to 
"If the class C and the package MyPackage of Example (4) shall support Reflection, …"

After rearranging sections, all examples were renumbered chronologically.

Actions taken:
November 15, 2005: received issue
March 8, 2006: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
MG Issue No: [Temp9]
Title:	Numbering and references to examples are not consistent.
Source:
Michael Soden, soden@ikv.de
Summary:
Example 8 is missing and example 10 references example 10 rather than example 4.

Discussion:

Resolution:
Example 9 should become example 8 and all following examples should be adjusted too. The statement
.If the class C and the package MyPackage of Example (10) shall support Reflection, ..
Should be altered to 
.If the class C and the package MyPackage of Example (4) shall support Reflection, ..
	
After rearranging sections, all examples were renumbered chronologically.

Disposition:	open