Issue 9571: BPEL faults (bpmn-ftf) Source: Capability Measurement (Mr. Karl Frank, Karl.Frank@ngc.com karl.frank@ngc.com karl.karolus@gmail.com karl.frank@capabilitymeasurement.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: BPEL faults are more complex than simple error name and handler may be selected basing on fault name and type of the related data. BPMN supports only error handler selection by name. A way of specifying the faults at sufficient detail to enable generation of BPEL faults is needed, by means of some text annotation property perhaps. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: April 13, 2006: received issue Discussion: Defer: While the Issue may be valid, it represents potentially significant modifications. Thus, this Issue will be deferred and handled by work on a later version of BPMN. End of Annotations:===== s is issue # 9571 BPEL faults BPEL faults are more complex than simple error name and handler may be selected basing on fault name and type of the related data. BPMN supports only error handler selection by name. A way of specifying the faults at sufficient detail to enable generation of BPEL faults is To: bpmn-ftf@omg.org Subject: Proposed Resolution for Issue 9571 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF242 April 21, 2006 From: Stephen A White Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:42:54 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM690/03/M/IBM(Release 7.0.1HF346 | August 4, 2006) at 11/10/2006 22:42:55, Serialize complete at 11/10/2006 22:42:55 This is intended for Ballot 5 (the first ballot of the FTF V2) Issue 9571: BPEL faults Description: BPEL faults are more complex than simple error name and handler may be selected basing on fault name and type of the related data. BPMN supports only error handler selection by name. A way of specifying the faults at sufficient detail to enable generation of BPEL faults is needed, by means of some text annotation property perhaps. Suggested Resolution: Defer: While the Issue may be valid, it represents potentially significant modifications. Thus, this Issue will be deferred and handled by work on a later version of BPMN. Revised Text: None needed, by means of some text annotation property perhaps.