Issue 9741: Basic Container Interceptors (qos4ccm-ftf) Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS (Mr. Tom Ritter, ritter@fokus.fraunhofer.de tom@users.berlios.de) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Could duplication of Portable Interceptor text be avoided? Why not just reference the descriptions of the PI intercept points in CORBA? Resolution: closed no change Revised Text: Actions taken: May 18, 2006: received issue January 15, 2008: closed issue Discussion: The description of the Portable Interceptors in the CORBA specification and the description of COPI differ in some but important sections and words. To reference the PI description and to explain the difference only would make this specification rather unreadable. For this reason it is better to keep the text in the specification. Disposition: Closed, no change End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 18 May 2006 04:22:54 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Tom Ritter Company: Fraunhofer FOKUS mailFrom: ritter@fokus.fraunhofer.de Notification: Yes Specification: QoS4CCM Section: 8.4 FormalNumber: ptc/06-04-15 Version: final adopted RevisionDate: April/2006 Page: 14 pp. Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.3) Gecko/20060426 Firefox/1.5.0.3 Description Basic Container Interceptors Could duplication of Portable Interceptor text be avoided? Why not just reference the descriptions of the PI intercept points in CORBA? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:27:19 +0200 From: Ansgar Radermacher User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070606) To: Tom Ritter Cc: qos4ccm-ftf@omg.org Subject: Re: Proposed solution to issue 9741 Tom Ritter wrote: Hi FTF member, i propose to close the issue 9741 and give the following explanation: The description of the Portable Interceptors in the CORBA specification and the description differ in some but important sections and words. To reference the PI description and to explain the difference only would make this specification rather unreadable. For this reason it is better to keep the text in the specification. Please respond if you have any comment regarding this issue. Cheers, Tom Hi Tom, could you please remind me what the most important differences are? (I'm not talking about wording) Thanks Ansgar -- Ansgar Radermacher CEA/DRT/LIST http://www-list.cea.fr/index.htm http://www2.cs.unibw.de/alumni/Ansgar/ phone: +33 16908 3812 mailto: ansgar.radermacher@cea.fr Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:52:04 +0200 From: Tom Ritter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) To: Ansgar Radermacher Cc: qos4ccm-ftf@omg.org Subject: Re: Proposed solution to issue 9741 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2007 06:52:02.0172 (UTC) FILETIME=[6F3793C0:01C7EB9B] X-Fraunhofer-Email-Policy: accepted Hi Ansgar, there is only minor difference and basically only in wording. For example "client" is replaced be "client component". My major argument here is, that specification will be rather unreadable if the description of these interception points are only referenced and I see no problem having the text here duplicated. Even if basic interceptors are very similar to PI, they are are two distinct concepts and they might evolve independently in future. Cheers, Tom Ansgar Radermacher wrote: Tom Ritter wrote: Hi FTF member, i propose to close the issue 9741 and give the following explanation: The description of the Portable Interceptors in the CORBA specification and the description differ in some but important sections and words. To reference the PI description and to explain the difference only would make this specification rather unreadable. For this reason it is better to keep the text in the specification. Please respond if you have any comment regarding this issue. Cheers, Tom Hi Tom, could you please remind me what the most important differences are? (I'm not talking about wording) Thanks Ansgar -- Tom Ritter Head of Working Area Model-Driven Engineering Fraunhofer FOKUS Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31 10589 Berlin, Germany +49 30 3463 - 7278 (fon), - 8000 (fax) mailto:tom.ritter@fokus.fraunhofer.de http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/ritter