Issue 9799: Section: 6.3.3 Test Data, CodingRule (uml-testing-profile-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Significant
Summary: UML Testing Profile defines that “the notation for coding rule is identical to a comment in UML”. Can coding rule be displayed as stereotype attribute (tagged value) using notation given by UML 2.0 specification?

Resolution: Since the UTP spec says (Section 6.3.3 Coding Rule, subsection Description) “Coding Rules are defined outside of the Testing Profile and referred to within Testing Profile specifications.” the coding rule can surely be displayed as ordinary tagged value of the Stereotype. The string does not define the coding rule itself, but rather an identifier for a coding rule that is part of the test execution system. 
We propose to change this issue with no change. 
Disposition:	Closed

Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
May 29, 2006: received issue
October 21, 2011: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 29 May 2006 09:42:37 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Jolita Mackiene
Company: No Magic, Inc.
mailFrom: jolita.mackiene@nomagic.com
Notification: Yes
Specification: UML 2.0 Testing Profile Specification
Section: 6.3.3 Test Data, CodingRule
FormalNumber: ptc
Version: 2.0
RevisionDate: 04/02/2004
Page: 36
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Significant
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Description
UML Testing Profile defines that .the notation for coding rule is identical to a comment in UML.. Can coding rule be displayed as stereotype attribute (tagged value) using notation given by UML 2.0 specification?