Issue 9951: Section: Clauses 8, 9, 11, 12 (sbvr-ftf) Source: Business Semantics Ltd. (Mr. Donald R. Chapin, Donald.Chapin(at)BusinessSemantics.com) Nature: Revision Severity: Critical Summary: ISSUE: Bring the Specification of SBVR Which is in Terms of Itself to the the Full SBVR Metamodel Standard The current specification of SBVR in terms of itself (SBVR Structured Englich) is not completed or up to full integrity in that: 1. not all SBVR metamodel constructs are specific for each SBVR entry in Clauses 8, 9, 1, and 12 2. some entries are lower quality than they should be, e.g. some definiitions are not fully structured; some necessities are missing; etc. 3. Definitions and Necessities have not been fully tested by software to see that all supporting entries in in SBVR. Resolution: Deferred to second SBVR Revision Task Force because there were more foundational issues that had to be resolved first, and it was very important SBVR v1.1 out as soon as they were done. Disposition: Deferred Revised Text: Actions taken: July 24, 2006: received issue Discussion: This Issue was received just before the Issue deadline which was only 6 weeks before the FTF report was due, and more basic Issues had to be resolved first. End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 24 Jul 2006 19:20:31 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Donald Chapin Company: Business Semanitcs Ltd mailFrom: Donald.Chapin@btinternet.com Notification: No Specification: SBVR Section: Clauses 8, 9, 11, 12 FormalNumber: dtc/06-03-02 Version: Interim Specification RevisionDate: March 2, 2006 Page: 13-70, 109-146 Nature: Revision Severity: Critical HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Description ISSUE: Bring the Specification of SBVR Which is in Terms of Itself to the the Full SBVR Metamodel Standard The current specification of SBVR in terms of itself (SBVR Structured Englich) is not completed or up to full integrity in that: 1. not all SBVR metamodel constructs are specific for each SBVR entry in Clauses 8, 9, 1, and 12 2. some entries are lower quality than they should be, e.g. some definiitions are not fully structured; some necessities are missing; etc. 3. Definitions and Necessities have not been fully tested by software to see that all supporting entries in in SBVR. Subject: RE: issue 9951 -- SBVR FTF issue Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:58:57 -0700 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: issue 9951 -- SBVR FTF issue thread-index: AcawEjVi3Wl/ER5NROWShbqir7mWjwNlsN/w From: "Baisley, Donald E" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2006 00:58:58.0185 (UTC) FILETIME=[7DF3AF90:01C6BDAA] Donald, Your issue sounds like a general charter for an FTF to clean up sloppiness. Identification of specific problems is much more helpful. If you think a certain Necessity needs to be included, but is missing, then put that in an issue. What can an FTF hope to do with such a general issue as this: .some entries are lower quality than they should be, e.g. some definiitions [sic] are not fully structured; some necessities are missing; etc..? If you claim there are .some. then you must have seen .some., so why don.t you send those as issues? I recommend this issue be closed with a request to its initiator to get specific. Don -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Juergen Boldt [mailto:juergen@omg.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:44 AM To: issues@omg.org; sbvr-ftf@omg.org Subject: issue 9951 -- SBVR FTF issue From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 24 Jul 2006 19:20:31 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Donald Chapin Company: Business Semanitcs Ltd mailFrom: Donald.Chapin@btinternet.com Notification: No Specification: SBVR Section: Clauses 8, 9, 11, 12 FormalNumber: dtc/06-03-02 Version: Interim Specification RevisionDate: March 2, 2006 Page: 13-70, 109-146 Nature: Revision Severity: Critical HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Description ISSUE: Bring the Specification of SBVR Which is in Terms of Itself to the the Full SBVR Metamodel Standard The current specification of SBVR in terms of itself (SBVR Structured Englich) is not completed or up to full integrity in that: 1. not all SBVR metamodel constructs are specific for each SBVR entry in Clauses 8, 9, 1, and 12 2. some entries are lower quality than they should be, e.g. some definiitions are not fully structured; some necessities are missing; etc. 3. Definitions and Necessities have not been fully tested by software to see that all supporting entries in in SBVR. Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org