Issues for Online Upgrades Finalization Task Force

To comment on any of these issues, send email to online-upgrades-ftf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 5446: Conformance Points appear to be contradictory
Issue 5447: multiplicities in class diagram on page 2-18 advisory or normative ?

Issue 5446: Conformance Points appear to be contradictory (online-upgrades-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: 2AB (Ms. Carol Burt, cburt@2ab.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:

Section 8.1 on Mandatory and Optional Interfaces, and Section 8.2 on
Conformance Points appear to be contradictory - you should define what you
mean by "the entire set of specifications" as a conformance point.   I'm
not sure what it means to say that you have to implement the entire
specification when some interfaces are "optional".  i would take this to
mean that a "conformant" implementation might be required to implement
optional interfaces and throw "NO_IMPLEMENT" on every operation on those
interfaces.  This should be clarified

Resolution: See below
Revised Text: In Section 8.2 Proposed Compliance Points, replace the sentence "The proposed compliance point is the entire set of specifications defined in this proposal." by the sentences "Two compliance points are defined. The first compliance point implements the membership style MEMB_INF_CTRL, but does not implement the membership style MEMB_APP_CTRL. The second compliance point implements both membership styles, MEMB_INF_CTRL and MEMB_APP_CTRL."
Actions taken:
June 27, 2002: received issue
March 10, 2004: closed issue

Issue 5447: multiplicities in class diagram on page 2-18 advisory or normative ? (online-upgrades-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: SAP AG (Mr. David Frankel, david.frankel@sap.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:

Issue for the Online Upgrades FTF, referencing document mars/02-03-02: The specification should clarify whether the multiplicities in the class diagram on page 2-18 are advisory or normative

Resolution: See below.
Revised Text: In Section 2.9, Platform Independent Model and a Mapping to CORBA, in the last paragraph on page 2-17, following the sentence "The class diagram represents the major responsible parties and subsystems involved in an Online Upgrade and their associations." insert the sentence "The multiplicities shown in this class diagram are normative."
Actions taken:
June 27, 2002: received issue
March 10, 2004: closed issue

Discussion: