Issues for Mailing list of the Reusable Asset Specification Finalization Task Force

To comment on any of these issues, send email to ras-ftf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 8283: RAS ptc/04-06-06 ID in Defaultcomponentprofile and Defaultwebserviceprofile
Issue 8284: Issue with RAS ptc/04-06-06 Defaultwebserviceprofile
Issue 8285: Issue with RAS ptc/04-06-06 Defaultcomponentprofile
Issue 9816: manifest file
Issue 9922: Section: 6.4.10
Issue 18318: manifest.rmb vs rasset.xml

Issue 8283: RAS ptc/04-06-06 ID in Defaultcomponentprofile and Defaultwebserviceprofile (ras-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: Caterpillar (Mr. Wayne Wulfert, wulfert_wayne_j(at)cat.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Associated Profile Issue:


I expected to find the GUID ID for the Defaultcomponentprofile and the
Defaultwebserviceprofile in the respective xsd files.  However, I don't
find any ID or reference to an ID

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
February 14, 2005: received issue

Discussion:
we need a way to specify the profile ID in the XSD file using some element/node that is not seen/used in the XML instance and can processed by tooling; this should be in RAS 2.0. We will search for a standard XML schema way to deal with this.
We need some XML expertise to provide guidance on how to resolve this issue.
Resolution:
We propose that we vote to defer this issue.


Issue 8284: Issue with RAS ptc/04-06-06 Defaultwebserviceprofile (ras-ftf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Caterpillar (Mr. Wayne Wulfert, wulfert_wayne_j(at)cat.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Associated xsd's:


There is an error when I try to load  "Defaultwebserviceprofile.xsd" as
shown below.  It is possible that I don't have the lastest version of the
file.

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
February 14, 2005: received issue

Discussion:
Resolution:
We propose that we vote to defer this issue


Issue 8285: Issue with RAS ptc/04-06-06 Defaultcomponentprofile (ras-ftf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Caterpillar (Mr. Wayne Wulfert, wulfert_wayne_j(at)cat.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Associated xsd's:


There is an error when I try to load  "Defaultcomponentprofile.xsd" as
shown below.  It is possible that I don't have the lastest version of the
file.

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
February 14, 2005: received issue

Discussion:
Resolution:
We propose that we vote to defer this issue


Issue 9816: manifest file (ras-ftf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Select Business Solutions (Callum Potter, callum.potter(at)selectbs.com)
Nature:
Severity:
Summary:
we have found a confusion in the RAS Specification 2.2, and was wondering if this is a bug in the spec, or if further clarification can be made.

It concerns the manifest file - in the spec this is mentioned to be both rasset.xml and manifest.rmd - could you let me know the preferred file name, unless these have different purposes, in which case can the difference be clarified ?


Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
June 9, 2006: received issue

Issue 9922: Section: 6.4.10 (ras-ftf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Significant
Summary:
There's a note that RAS supports pointing to external schemas for classifying assets in the classification section. But I don't find any information or examples how that works, neither in RAS Version 2.2 nor in the internet. Are there any examples about the use of an external classification schema? 

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
July 17, 2006: received issue

Issue 18318: manifest.rmb vs rasset.xml (ras-ftf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary:
I am seeking a clarification on an item in the RAS 2.2 spec. I have seen instances of this being raised before some years ago but have not found what the resolution was.


RAS 2.2 seems to give conflicting definitions for the standard name to be used for the root directory Manifest file to be used in a RAS .ras file.


Is it rasset.xml or manifest.rmb?


Or do the two names get used in different contexts?


Some clarification please.

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
December 14, 2012: received issue