Issues for Mailing list of the SysML-Modelica Transformation Specification Finalization Task Force

To comment on any of these issues, send email to sysml-modelica-ftf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 17219: figure still uses <<conformsTo>> <<transformation>> and <<instanceOf>> applied to lines using the Dependency notation
Issue 17245: level of conformance for uni-directional transformation

Issue 17219: figure still uses <<conformsTo>> <<transformation>> and <<instanceOf>> applied to lines using the Dependency notation (sysml-modelica-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com)
Nature: Revision
Severity:
Summary:

the new figure still uses <<conformsTo>> <<transformation>> and <<instanceOf>> applied to lines using the Dependency notation. These have no defined meaning (either as keywords nor as stereotypes defined either in this specification, SysML or UML). Whatever <<instanceOf>> means it’s not the case that a transformationRecord is an instance of a transformation. If these stereotypes are retained there should be an explanation to say they are purely informal

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
March 9, 2012: received issue

Discussion:

Issue 17245: level of conformance for uni-directional transformation (sysml-modelica-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:

I would have expected a level of conformance for uni-directional transformation – especially given the Overview which refers only to such.

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
March 19, 2012: received issue