Issues for Mailing list of the TelcoML 1.0 Finalization Task Force

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 17195: Inclusion of the SES/SMI in the Enabler library
Issue 17196: Misplaced “Generic Messaging” title
Issue 17197: Typo error for SMSDeliveryReceiptDescription in 8.4.2.1.1 Data Types
Issue 17198: Error in number of datatypes in “8.4.2.1.1 DataTypes”.
Issue 17199: Inconsistent paragraph style for one operation title in section 8.4.2.3.2.
Issue 17500: OneAPIs specs (SMS,MMS,Location) in TelcoML need revision
Issue 17576: References to OMG specs (like UML) should be updated to refer to the last versions
Issue 17577: The terms and definitions should not contain terms already defined in OMG context

Issue 17195: Inclusion of the SES/SMI in the Enabler library (telcoml-ftf)

In the beta spec the SES/SMI interface is provided in an annex waiting for update

from TMF SES team.

If such update is provided the final TelcoML v1.0 should incorporate this interface

within an additional Section  within the telcoML library (should be section 8.11).

In the beta spec (ptc-12-01-02) the title “8.3.1  Generic Messaging” is misplaced.

It should be at the same level than the others interfaces, that is to say at level 2

instead of level 3.

In section 8.4.2.1.1 Data Types, “SMSDeliveryReceiptDescription”  should be 

in “SMSDeliveryReceiptSubscription” (two occurrences of text).

Similar problem exists in Section 8.5.2.1.1 Data Types:  

“MMSDeliveryReceiptDescription”  should be 

 “MMSDeliveryReceiptSubscription” (two occurrences of text)

It is said “The specification of the SMS interface involves the definition of seven data types

and one enumeration:”. However in fact there are 6 datatypes and 1 enumeration.

The same happens in 8.5.2.1.1 Data Types: There are 7 datatypes, not 8.

 

The paragraph style used for operation “Receiving the notification of arrival of messages

for a client application” should be the same than for other operations titles in the spec

(italic and bold).

The GSMA consortium has published new versions of SMS, MMS and Location APIs.

Hence the UML versions of these APIs in the draft TelcoML spec need be revised and possible

moved from the core document for maintenance reasons.

 

The actual references to OMG specs like UML do not refer to the last versions of

the specs.

This need to be corrected, especially for consistency with the provided XMI files.

 

The terms of definitions chapters contains terms that are already know to OMG community and

that are not specifically defined in telcoML. These do not need to appear in the section.