Issues for Mailing list of the UML Profile for CORBA and CCM Finalization Task Force

To comment on any of these issues, send email to uml-corba-ccm-ftf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 11158: Section: 8.1.2
Issue 11159: Section: 8.2.1 - 2
Issue 12359: Section 9 of UML Profile for CORBA and CCM
Issue 18380: Inconsistent capitalization of <<CORBATypedef>>

Issue 11158: Section: 8.1.2 (uml-corba-ccm-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary:

Litteral of the enumeration PrimitiveKind are prefixed with "CORBA" or "Corba", instead of "CORBA" (upper case) for all litterals

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
July 18, 2007: received issue

Discussion:

Issue 11159: Section: 8.2.1 - 2 (uml-corba-ccm-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Significant
Summary:

P. 51 . The CORBAUses stereotype has a property "multiple" of type PrimitiveKind P. 53 . The CORBAUses stereotype has a property "isMultiple" of type boolean. This looks like a naming and type inconsistency between diagram and tabular representation of the stereotype. If this is the case and isMultiple is really typed boolean, PrimitiveKind becomes useless (I did not find any other use of PrimitiveKind in the profile). If not (I mean PrimitiveKind is the wanted type), it may be better to type the "multiple" property with the "CORBAPrimitive" stereotype instead of creating and using an enumeration like PrimitiveKind.

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
July 18, 2007: received issue

Issue 12359: Section 9 of UML Profile for CORBA and CCM (uml-corba-ccm-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: Objective Interface Systems (Mr. Victor Giddings, victor.giddings(at)mail.ois.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary:

Chapter 9 should be clearly marked as non-normative. Noted during smsc review. Thus, formal document number not available

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
March 31, 2008: received issue

Issue 18380: Inconsistent capitalization of <<CORBATypedef>> (uml-corba-ccm-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: EADS (Mr. Oliver M. Kellogg, oliver.kellogg(at)cassidian.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary:

For the stereotype designating IDL "typedef", the UML Profile for CORBA
v1.0 (02-04-01) uses the capitalization "CORBATypedef".
The UML Profile for CORBA and CCM v1.0 (08-04-07) sometimes uses the
same capitalization but also uses the capitalization "CORBATypeDef"
(notice the capital "D".)
For compatibility with the UML Profile for CORBA, I suggest replacing
all occurrences of "CORBATypeDef" by "CORBATypedef".

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
January 21, 2013: received issue