Issues for UPDM Finalization Task Force

To comment on any of these issues, send email to updm-ftf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 11783: Current navigability is wrong
Issue 11974: StrategicMission
Issue 12057: OperationalNodeSpecification

Issue 11783: Current navigability is wrong (updm-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: No Magic, Inc. (Mr. Andrius Strazdauskas, andriuss(at)nomagic.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Current navigability is wrong, same PerformanceMeasurementSet can be applied for only one ConformingElement. It should be 1..*.

Resolution: closed issue, withdrawn by submitter
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
December 7, 2007: received issue
December 10, 2007: closed issue

Issue 11974: StrategicMission (updm-ftf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
·	This entity also requires further considerations. It seems better placed as either part of the StrategicViews or the OperationalViews. Given the attributes contained it would seem to be very focused on actual operations something that does not actually fit with its name. The fact that the parameters are only strings furthermore makes one question whether it can actually be used to describe something of architectural value.

Resolution: duplicate of 11973
Revised Text:
Actions taken:

Issue 12057: OperationalNodeSpecification (updm-ftf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
it is not clear why this is needed – there is no need to
separate nodes from their behaviour. In fact, operational nodes are little more than
collections of operational activities, hence this is a strange choice. It becomes stranger still
when the need to also use Materiel is taken into account, which adds up to a significant and
not altogether useful level of indirection.

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
December 28, 2007: received issue
April 26, 2010: closed issue