Issue 13722: Fig 14 & Fig 16 - Consistent Profile Usage
Issue 13733: Fig19 - More Needed Here
Issue 13722: Fig 14 & Fig 16 - Consistent Profile Usage (updm-rtf)
Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: Model Futures Ltd. (Mr. Ian Bailey, ian(at)modelfutures.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: Minor
Summary:
Summary Fig 14 & Fig 16 - Consistent Profile Usage. Fig 16 shows which Metaclass is being extended. Figure 14 does not. Suggest metaclasses be shown (even at the cost of making the diagrams busy). Diagram All Document Issue UPDM (OMG Beta) Jan 2009 Section Page Priority Low Source Ian BaileyModel Futuresian@modelfutures.com Date 3rd March 2009 Rationale Resolution POTENTIAL SOLUTION:If supported by MagicDraw, we should add a compartment to each of the symbols to indicate the extended element (where the extension is not shown on the diagram). Adding the extensions to all of the diagrams would make it pretty much unreadable.Andrius to confirm whether this is possible.
Doing this would make the diagrams too cluttered. The issue is deferred.
Fig19 - More Needed Here. Can you also add ExternalTuple (under OntologyReference), and ExternalTupleType (under ExternalType)? This is to allow references to relationships defined in the ontology. We missed this in MODAF, and is now causing us problems. Would be really great if you could fix it in UPDM. Thanks. Diagram AV Document Issue UPDM (OMG Beta) Jan 2009 Resolution It makes sense to add this as it gives us a complete mapping to IDEAS. We'll look at incorporating this into the next version of UPDM.
It makes sense to add this as it gives us a complete mapping to IDEAS. We'll look at incorporating this into the next version of UPDM. Disposition: Deferred