|
OMG TECHNICAL MEETING SPECIAL EVENTSeminar on Systems Assurance & Safety for
Consumer Devices:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| 09:00 - 09:30 | Setting the Agenda: Standards for Assurance & Safety for Consumer Devices |
|
Richard Mark Soley, Ph.D. Chairman and CEO, OMG |
|
| 09:30 - 10:00 | OMG: Not your Father’s CORBA Organization Any Longer |
|
Dr. Ben A.
Calloni, P.E., CISSP |
|
| 10:00 - 10:30 |
Morning
Refreshments |
| 10:30 - 11:00 | Assurance Issues in the Automotive Product Development Lifecycle |
|
Steve J Nykerk Business Solutions Professional, IBM Global Business Services Digital transformation is making products smarter, but
also adding significant complexity challenges, particularly
to the software lifecycle. The introduction of a domain
model concept will be presented as well as potential
approaches to vehicle security prioritization. |
|
| 11:00 - 11:30 | Possible Standardization Activities in OMG for the Safety of Consumer Devices: Automotive, Service Robots, Smart Buildings |
|
Akira Ohata Senior General Manager, Toyota Consumer devices are coined for the products used in
open, dynamic and diverse environment by general users like
automotive, service robots and smart buildings. This
presentation proposes the standardization activities of
safety assurance in OMG. Those should cover rapid iterations
evaluating system behaviors and accurate dynamic behavior
predictions for the risk identification. Awareness of
physical influence from the controlled object can improve
the software development productivity considerably because
physics must be reflected to control software and almost
determine the structure of control software even if the
developer doesn't notice the fact explicitly. |
|
| 11:30 - 12:00 | Compressing Time-to-market with Safety-critical Processes |
|
Bill Beckwith President, Objective Interface Systems (OIS) Consumer products are increasingly becoming more capable of initiating physical action based on machine intelligence. This physical enablement leads to dramatic advances in consumer convenience and enjoyment but with an increased potential for danger to the customer. Machine intelligence is typically realized through advances in software technology. And the average quality of software in enterprise and embedded systems is very far from acceptable for any safety-critical system. However, there are methods that are used successfully to produce software that lives can depend on. Modern commercial aviation systems rely upon software for many life safety critical functions by using processes called DO-178B (software) and DO-254 (hardware). And the software in these systems has an amazingly good safety record. The failure rate of much of this software surpasses the failure rates of the materials used to build safety-critical physical components of the airframe. The perspective of most marketing executives is that
strict engineering requirements processes dramatically slow
the time-to-market of new products. However, by including
marketing personnel who are experts in understanding the
nature of the customer problem in a well formed requirements
process companies can accelerate the delivery of their
products to market. And if these companies faithful follow
the well-formed requirements traceability system like
DO-178B and DO-254 then they will dramatically reduce the
probability for injuring customers. |
|
| 12:00 - 14:00 |
Luncheon Plenary |
| 14:00 - 14:30 | Safety of Personal Care Robots as an Example of Consumer Devices |
|
Yoshihiro Nakabo Research Scientist, AIST New personal care robots are expected to be introduced
into consumer's daily life. For manufacturers,
responsibility of safety of their products becomes heavier.
Safety certification using assurance cases can be a solution
for such problem?A standardization activity on "risk
assessment" ongoing in OMG will be explained. |
|
| 14:30 - 15:00 | Meta-modeling Approach to Safety Standards for Consumer Devices |
|
Kenji Taguchi, Ph.D. Invited Senior Research Scientist, AIST International standards are not easily understood and
sometimes there are some rooms for misinterpretations. There
have been some efforts to remedy this shortcomings such as
using a formal notation, e.g., the Z notation to rigorously
specify them. The aim of this talk is to show that the
meta-modelling approach mainly having been practiced at OMG
to specify standards is feasible to scrutinize the
underlingy concepts for existing functional safety
standards. |
|
| 15:00 - 15:30 |
Afternoon Refreshments |
| 15:30 - 17:00 | Discussion: New Standards Development Direction for Systems Assurance Platform Task Force and Robotics Domain Task Force at OMG |
