Voting Status for Automated Function Point RFC

Vote tallies

Documents:
Relevant documents: admtf/12-09-04 (Automated Function Points, Version 1 Beta 1 - inventory file), admtf/12-09-03 (Dispensation of Architecture Board Comments on 2012-08-16), admtf/12-09-02 (XMI for Automated Function Points, Version 1 Beta 1 RFC), admtf/12-09-01 (Automated Function Points, Version 1 Beta 1 RFC), admtf/12-08-04 (LOI for Automated Function Point RFC)

Company NameVote
88solutionsYes
AISTYes
AdaptiveYes
Advanced Systems Management Group Ltd. 
AtegoYes
Be Informed 
Benchmark ConsultingYes
CA Technologies 
CAST SoftwareYes
CSCAbstain
Deere & CompanyYes
ETRI 
Eclipse FoundationAbstain
Energistics 
Fraunhofer FOKUSYes
FujitsuYes
GNOME Foundation 
Hewlett-PackardYes
Hitachi, Ltd. 
HondaYes
InfostroyYes
International Business MachinesYes
Ivar Jacobson International AB 
KDM Analytics 
Lockheed MartinYes
MITREYes
Mayo ClinicAbstain
Mentor Graphics CorporationYes
Microsoft CorporationAbstain
Model Driven SolutionsYes
No Magic, Inc. 
Nokia 
Objective Interface SystemsYes
Open Geospatial Consortium 
PNA GroupAbstain
PrismTechYes
Progeny Systems 
Real-Time InnovationsYes
Red HatAbstain
Remedy ITAbstain
RunTime Computing Solutions, LLCAbstain
SofteamAbstain
Software Centre of Excellence, Rolls-Royce Div.Yes
Sparx SystemsYes
TCSAbstain
THALESYes
TIBCOYes
TOBESOFT Co., Ltd.Yes
The Open GroupAbstain
The Software Revolution 
Thematix Partners LLCYes
Toyota Motor Corporation 
UMTP 
UnisysYes
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de MexicoAbstain
University of YorkYes
W3 Consortium 
WebRatio 
eProsima 
Vote Tally for: AFP
YES Votes: 28
NO Votes: 0
ABSTAIN Votes: 12
Voting summary
Registered: 59 voters
Quorum: 30 votes required - QUORATE
Recommendation status: PASSING