Voting Status for Automated Source Code Quality Measures (ASCQM) 1.0 FTF

Vote tallies

Documents:
/home/httpd/htdocs/techprocess/faxvotes/Automated_Source_Code_Quality_Measures_(ASCQM)_1.0_FTF.html.tmp, ptc/19-06-05 (Responses to ASCQM 1.0 FTF reviewer comments), ptc/19-06-04 (Automated Source Code Quality Measures XMI file), ptc/19-06-03 (Automated Source Code Quality Measures convenience document with change bars), ptc/19-06-02 (Automated Source Code Quality Measures convenience document clean), ptc/19-06-01 (Updated ASCQM 1.0 FTF report)

Company NameVote
88solutionsYes
ACORD 
ADLINK Technology LtdAbstain
AISTYes
AdaptiveYes
Advanced Systems Management Group Ltd.Yes
BoeingAbstain
Business Architecture GuildYes
CA Technologies 
CAST SoftwareYes
Change Vision 
Commissariat a l Energie Atomique-CEA 
Dell Technologies 
Eclipse FoundationAbstain
Elemental Reasoning 
Energistics 
Ford Motor Company 
Fraunhofer FOKUSYes
Fujitsu 
GfSE e.V.Yes
GurumNetworks, Inc. 
INCOSEAbstain
IOTA Foundation 
International Business MachinesYes
Jackrabbit ConsultingAbstain
KDM Analytics 
Lockheed MartinYes
MITREYes
Micro Focus International PlcYes
Model Driven SolutionsYes
Multi Agency Collaboration EnvironmentAbstain
No Magic, Inc.Yes
Objective Interface SystemsYes
OntoAgeYes
Open Geospatial ConsortiumAbstain
OrangeWire Systems, LLC 
PNA Group 
PTCYes
Real-Time InnovationsYes
Siemens 
Simula Research Laboratory 
SofteamAbstain
Sparx Systems 
TCSYes
THALESYes
TSG, Inc.Yes
The Open GroupAbstain
The Software Revolution 
Thematix Partners LLCYes
Twin Oaks Computing, Inc.Yes
W3 Consortium 
ZTI Systems Ltd. 
eProsima 
Vote Tally for: ASC
YES Votes: 23
NO Votes: 0
ABSTAIN Votes: 9
Voting summary
Registered: 53 voters
Quorum: 27 votes required - QUORATE
Recommendation status: PASSING