Voting Status for DOL 1.0 FTF 2

Vote tallies

Documents:
Relevant documents: ad/15-10-02 (OntoIOp/DOL revised submission - MOF metamodel), ptc/17-11-17 (DOL 1.0 FTF metamodel tool file), ptc/17-11-16 (DOL 1.0 FTF ancillary .zip archive), ptc/17-11-15 (diff document for the DOL ontology to highlight the changes (informative)), ptc/17-11-14 (DOL Terminology Ontology 1.0 VOM/MagicDraw Model (ancillary)), ptc/17-11-13 (DOL Terminology Ontology 1.0 ODM XMI (informative)), ptc/17-11-12 (DOL Terminology Ontology 1.0 ODM UML XMI (informative)), ptc/17-11-11 (DOL Terminology Ontology 1.0 RDF/XML-serialized OWL (informative)), ptc/17-11-10 (DOL 1.0 revised specification with change bars), ptc/17-11-09 (DOL 1.0 revised specification clean)

Company NameVote
88solutionsYes
ACORD 
AIST 
AdaptiveYes
Adelard LLP 
Advanced Systems Management Group Ltd.Yes
Agile Enterprise DesignAbstain
Business Architecture GuildYes
CA Technologies 
CAST SoftwareYes
Change VisionAbstain
DCS CorporationYes
Dell Technologies 
Eclipse FoundationAbstain
Energistics 
Ford Motor Company 
Fraunhofer FOKUSYes
FujitsuYes
GfSE e.V.Yes
INCOSEAbstain
International Business MachinesYes
Jackrabbit ConsultingYes
KDM AnalyticsYes
Lockheed MartinYes
MITREYes
Model Driven SolutionsYes
ModelFoundry 
Multi Agency Collaboration EnvironmentYes
No Magic, Inc.Yes
Northrop GrummanYes
Objective Interface SystemsYes
Open Geospatial ConsortiumAbstain
PNA GroupAbstain
PTCYes
PrismTech 
Real-Time InnovationsYes
Simula Research Laboratory 
SofteamAbstain
Sparx Systems 
TCSYes
THALESYes
TSG, Inc.Yes
The Open GroupAbstain
The Software RevolutionYes
Thematix Partners LLCYes
Twin Oaks Computing, Inc.Yes
W3 Consortium 
ZTI Systems Ltd. 
eProsima 
Vote Tally for: DOL
YES Votes: 27
NO Votes: 0
ABSTAIN Votes: 8
Voting summary
Registered: 49 voters
Quorum: 25 votes required - QUORATE
Recommendation status: PASSING