Voting Status for UML Profile for ROSETTA (UPR) 1.0 FTF

Vote tallies

Documents:
/home/httpd/htdocs/techprocess/faxvotes/UML_Profile_for_ROSETTA_(UPR)_1.0_FTF.html.tmp, ptc/19-06-12 (UML Profile for ROSETTA (UPR) convenience document with change bars), ptc/19-06-11 (UML Profile for ROSETTA (UPR) convenience document clean), ptc/19-06-10 (UML Profile for ROSETTA (UPR) 1.0 FTF report), ptc/19-05-24 (Library XMI), ptc/19-05-09 (UPR 1.0 Updated Example Models in MagicDraw), ptc/19-05-08 (UPR 1.0 Updated figures), ptc/19-05-07 (UPR 1.0 Updated Profile Model in MagicDraw), ptc/19-05-06 (UPR 1.0 FTF - Profile XMI file), ptc/19-05-05 (UPR 1.0 FTF ancillary attachment file)

Company NameVote
88solutionsYes
ACORD 
ADLINK Technology Ltd 
AISTYes
AdaptiveYes
Advanced Systems Management Group Ltd.Yes
Boeing 
Business Architecture GuildYes
CA Technologies 
CAST Software 
Change Vision 
Commissariat a l Energie Atomique-CEA 
Dell Technologies 
Eclipse FoundationAbstain
Elemental Reasoning 
Energistics 
Ford Motor Company 
Fraunhofer FOKUSYes
Fujitsu 
GfSE e.V.Yes
GurumNetworks, Inc. 
INCOSEAbstain
IOTA Foundation 
International Business Machines 
Jackrabbit ConsultingYes
KDM Analytics 
Lockheed MartinYes
MITREYes
Micro Focus International PlcYes
Model Driven SolutionsYes
Multi Agency Collaboration Environment 
No Magic, Inc. 
Objective Interface Systems 
OntoAgeYes
Open Geospatial Consortium 
OrangeWire Systems, LLC 
PNA Group 
PTC 
Real-Time InnovationsYes
Siemens 
Simula Research Laboratory 
Softeam 
Sparx Systems 
TCS 
THALESYes
TSG, Inc.Yes
The Open GroupAbstain
The Software Revolution 
Thematix Partners LLCYes
Twin Oaks Computing, Inc. 
W3 Consortium 
ZTI Systems Ltd. 
eProsima 
Vote Tally for: UPR
YES Votes: 17
NO Votes: 0
ABSTAIN Votes: 3
Voting summary
Registered: 53 voters
Quorum: 27 votes required - NOT QUORATE
Recommendation status: PASSING