Voting Status for UML Testing Profile 2 (UTP2) 2.1 RTF

Vote tallies

Documents:
/home/httpd/htdocs/techprocess/faxvotes/UML_Testing_Profile_2_(UTP2)_2.1_RTF.html.tmp, ptc/19-06-25 (Machine readable file: utp2_typeslibrary.xmi), ptc/19-06-24 (Machine readable file: utp2_library.xmi), ptc/19-06-23 (Machine readable file: utp2.xmi), ptc/19-06-22 (UML Testing Profile 2 (UTP2) 2.1 convenience document with change bars), ptc/19-06-21 (UML Testing Profile 2 (UTP2) 2.1 convenience document clean), ptc/19-06-20 (UML Testing Profile 2 (UTP2) 2.1 RTF report), ptc/19-05-14 (Papyrus files, ancillary), ptc/19-05-13 (UTP 2.1 ancillary attachment file)

Company NameVote
88solutionsYes
ACORD 
ADLINK Technology LtdAbstain
AIST 
Adaptive 
Advanced Systems Management Group Ltd.Yes
BoeingAbstain
Business Architecture Guild 
CA Technologies 
CAST SoftwareYes
Change Vision 
Commissariat a l Energie Atomique-CEA 
Dell Technologies 
Eclipse FoundationAbstain
Elemental ReasoningYes
Energistics 
Ford Motor Company 
Fraunhofer FOKUS 
Fujitsu 
GfSE e.V.Yes
GurumNetworks, Inc. 
INCOSEYes
IOTA Foundation 
International Business MachinesYes
Jackrabbit ConsultingAbstain
KDM Analytics 
Lockheed MartinYes
MITREYes
Micro Focus International PlcYes
Model Driven Solutions 
Multi Agency Collaboration EnvironmentAbstain
No Magic, Inc.Yes
Objective Interface SystemsYes
OntoAgeYes
Open Geospatial ConsortiumAbstain
OrangeWire Systems, LLC 
PNA Group 
PTCYes
Real-Time Innovations 
Siemens 
Simula Research Laboratory 
SofteamYes
Sparx Systems 
TCSYes
THALESYes
TSG, Inc.Yes
The Open GroupAbstain
The Software Revolution 
Thematix Partners LLCYes
Twin Oaks Computing, Inc.Yes
W3 Consortium 
ZTI Systems Ltd. 
eProsima 
Vote Tally for: UT2
YES Votes: 20
NO Votes: 0
ABSTAIN Votes: 7
Voting summary
Registered: 53 voters
Quorum: 27 votes required - QUORATE
Recommendation status: PASSING