Issues for Firewall RTF mailing list

To comment on any of these issues, send email to firewall-rtf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 2461: question re BiDir IIOP

Issue 2461: question re BiDir IIOP (firewall-rtf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Summary: I am having difficulty understanding the intended use of
 BiDirPolicy::BidirectionalPolicy. This is described (in section 15.9) as
 a POA policy to be passed to create_POA. That section also says that
 both client and server must have the policy with the value of BOTH for
 bi-directional communication to take place.
 
 My problem is that I don"t see how this policy applies to a particular
 POA. Once bi-directional communication has been negotiated on a
 connection, it applies to any request targetted at the negotiated
 address(es), regardless of what POA is the recipient of the request. Nor
 is it tied to the lifetime of a particular POA. And, what is supposed to
 happen if one POA has the policy with value BOTH, and another POA has
 the policy with value NORMAL?
 

Resolution: :BidirectionalPolicy. This is described (in section 15.9) as
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
February 19, 1999: received issue

Discussion: