Issues for Diagram Definition 1.2 Revision Task Force

To comment on any of these issues, send email to [email protected]. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to [email protected].

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Jira Issues

Issue 16492: Constraints Jira Issue DD12-4
Issue 18680: Consider possibility of adding Port concept to DI Jira Issue DD12-3
Issue 19485: Small typo. Jira Issue DD12-2
Issue 19486: Small typos. Jira Issue DD12-1

Issue 16492: Constraints (dd-rtf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:

The spec currently has no constraint sections.  Should we add them?  For  example, we might require unowned diagram elements to be diagrams

Resolution: This was received before the DD 1.1 RTF comment deadline of March 31, 2012, but was not addressed by the RTF due to lack of time. Disposition: Deferred
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
January 31, 2011: received issue

Issue 18680: Consider possibility of adding Port concept to DI (dd-rtf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS (Mr. Max Bureck, max.bureck(at)fokus.fraunhofer.de)
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Minor
Summary:

Hi, the concept of ports, attached to the outside bounds of an element allowing connections between elements is a widespread concept. Adding this concept would help generic layouting algorithms taking ports into account (such as KIELER) doing a much better job. Since DI defines abstract subclasses, meta models without ports can simply choose to not use the concept.

Resolution: This was received after the DD 1.1 RTF comment deadline of March 31, 2012. Disposition: Deferred
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
April 22, 2013: received issue

Issue 19485: Small typo. (dd-rtf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:

There is a small typo in the DD specification document.  On page 17 we can read:  "namely the Diagram Graphics(DI) package (Clause 9) and the Diagram Interchange(DG) package"      The acronyms in the parenthesis are reversed, it should be Diagram Graphics(DG) and Diagram Interchange(DI).

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
June 23, 2014: received issue

Issue 19486: Small typos. (dd-rtf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Minor
Summary:

There are some typos in the attributes description of Color data type, we can read:  "Integer [1] - the red component of the color in the range (0..255)"  for all three components, green and blue included.      The description should reflect the correct color.

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
June 23, 2014: received issue